CISA and G7 Sound the Alarm on Quantum Computing's Threat to Encryption

A joint call to action urges governments and businesses to start swapping out today's cryptography before quantum computers make it useless.

ThreatVectr NewsdeskAI-assistedPublished Updated · Editor: Lee Brown· 4 min read
International government building facades and modern office headquarters photographed from street level, with subtle encryption symbols and quantum wave visuali
Illustration made with AI. Not a photograph of the events described.
Share

Key points

  • CISA and the G7 Cyber Security Working Group jointly published "Preparing for the Post-Quantum Era: A Call to Action" urging a global move to post-quantum cryptography.
  • The guidance lists five priorities, including national strategies, research funding, and building quantum-safe requirements into government purchasing.
  • Sensitive data stolen today can be decrypted later once quantum computers mature, a tactic known as "harvest now, decrypt later."
  • The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology finalised its first post-quantum encryption standards in August 2024, giving organisations concrete algorithms to adopt.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has teamed up with the G7 Cyber Security Working Group to say, politely but firmly, that replacing the maths protecting almost every login and bank transfer can't wait.

Their joint paper, published through CISA Cybersecurity Advisories, is called "Preparing for the Post-Quantum Era: A Call to Action." It's aimed at governments and regulators, but any business that relies on encryption should read it too.

What is the actual problem?

Today's encryption relies on maths problems that ordinary computers can't solve in any reasonable time. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer, a new kind of machine that works on the strange rules of quantum physics, could crack a lot of that maths in hours.

That matters for two reasons. First, once quantum machines arrive, anything still protected by today's algorithms is readable. Second, hostile actors are already grabbing encrypted traffic and stashing it, betting they can decrypt it later. Researchers call this "harvest now, decrypt later."

Banking sessions, medical records, and the digital signatures that prove a software update is genuine all sit on the same shaky foundation.

What are CISA and the G7 actually asking for?

They're asking organisations to plan the switch to post-quantum cryptography, or PQC, a new family of encryption algorithms designed to resist quantum attacks. Five priorities are set out.

Priority What it means in plain terms
Awareness Make leaders understand the quantum risk exists now, not in 2040
National strategies Governments write formal roadmaps for PQC adoption
Research and development Fund work on quantum-safe tools and testing
Public-private partnerships Vendors, banks, and agencies share what they learn
Procurement rules Bake PQC into what governments and regulators buy

The procurement point is sharpest. When a government refuses to buy software that can't do post-quantum key exchange, vendors move fast. We noted a related dynamic on 25 August, when chip makers began embedding PQC directly into silicon ahead of any regulatory mandate.

Is any of this real yet, or still theory?

The algorithms are real. In August 2024 the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology published its first three finalised post-quantum standards, including ML-KEM for key exchange and ML-DSA for digital signatures. Cloud providers and browser makers have started rolling them out in hybrid mode, running old and new algorithms side by side.

What's missing is the unglamorous middle work: inventorying every certificate, every VPN, every hard-coded library across an organisation, then swapping them out without breaking anything. That takes years.

On the authentication side, this isn't a story about multi-factor authentication saving the day. MFA proves who you are at login. PQC protects the cryptographic channel your login travels through, and the signatures on the tokens your identity provider issues. Both need to be quantum-safe.

Should you worry?

If you're an individual, almost nothing to do directly. This is an infrastructure job for vendors, hospitals, and governments. Keep your software updated so you receive PQC support when providers ship it. If you run a small business, ask your VPN and identity vendors what their post-quantum roadmap looks like. A vague answer is itself an answer.

The quantum computer capable of breaking today's encryption may be a decade away. The data being stolen and stored today is already at risk, which is the whole point of what CISA and the G7 published.

© 2026 Threat Vectr